Search found 57 matches
- Tue Jul 14, 2015 6:52 am
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Let's Write a Story Together, One Sentence at a Time!
- Replies: 46
- Views: 50673
Re: Let's Write a Story Together, One Sentence at a Time!
Trust me, the story of my tiger is getting to that.
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:07 pm
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
To be honest, I figured that there was too much of a risk of the Scum killing me first. Even if I jumped around, there was a good chance I died. So I took a gamble.
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:00 pm
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
The problem is partly that you didn't change you're victory condition, I think. Win condition for town is "You are TOWN, and win when all the scum are dead." Your win condition was "You win if you are still alive at the end of the game." You dont seem to be town, so you're scum unless there's a ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:11 pm
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
We *could*, except you're jumping tonight if we don't kill you, which means after that anyone could claim to be the Immortal, and their win condition might not be so Town friendly. Then they're just like any other Mafia. Any Mafia could roleclaim anything at all, in principle. It's not like we have ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:06 pm
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Assuming my post was on the level (which I of course say it is), then my victory condition is perfectly compatible with the Town's victory condition. If I'm alive and the other Mafia are dead, I have no reason to kill anyone so common sense says that's a joint victory. I assumed people thought I'd ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:50 pm
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Why is everyone saying I'm a pure scum? Are we all assuming I edited my post to show a different victory condition?
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:57 am
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Crap. Maybe I misread the description or something.
I give up. I've probably lost this anyway. I'm "innocent" insofar as my roleclaim was 100% accurate, but that's hardly going to help me now.
I give up. I've probably lost this anyway. I'm "innocent" insofar as my roleclaim was 100% accurate, but that's hardly going to help me now.
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:51 am
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
What? The other body is DANIELH. Right? That's DanielH, isn't it, the insubstantial demonic soul-eating wisp? Calling it a "body" is actually kind of a stretch, but THAT WAS ALWAYS JUST HIS WAY, WASN'T IT, BEING INSUBSTANTIAL, DRIFTING THROUGH WALLS, INTERSECTING WITH SLEEPING VICTIMS AND CONSUMING ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:05 am
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Guys- let's think about this logically. At absolute minimum, I am not a conventional Scum player or I would not be trying to out J-Mafia. We know DanielH is Conventional Scum, of course, as Alicorn didn't mention anything special about him except his Essence jumping. Say the Town being destroyed is ...
- Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:01 am
- Forum: Board Games
- Topic: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
- Replies: 431
- Views: 208970
Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Vote PlainDealingVillain before I forget. As I already said, he's a long shot but the most likely single Mafia right now. EDIT: Though we do need to take this into account. If PlainDealingVillian and DanielH were the two Mafia players, they likely coordinated. Does what we see sound like what we'd ...