Let’s try some anagrams.
arda
adra
aard
aadr
adar
arad
rdaa
draa
daar
raad
(I don’t have room for dara or rada)
Cooperative Zendo
-
kuuskytkolme
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
Re: Cooperative Zendo
So it turns out case isn’t irrelevant.
ARDA
ARDa
ARdA
ARda
ArDA
ArDa
ArdA
aRDA
aRDa
aRdA
(no room for aRda, arDA, arDa, ardA)
(Arda and arda already done)
ARDA
ARDa
ARdA
ARda
ArDA
ArDa
ArdA
aRDA
aRDa
aRdA
(no room for aRda, arDA, arDa, ardA)
(Arda and arda already done)
-
kuuskytkolme
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Yes: ARDa, ARda, ArDa, aRDA, aRdA
No: ARDA, ARdA, ArDA, ArdA, aRDa
No: ARDA, ARdA, ArDA, ArdA, aRDa
Information
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.
Re: Cooperative Zendo
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
-
kuuskytkolme
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
Re: Cooperative Zendo
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
-
kuuskytkolme
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Again, all yes.
Information
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.
Re: Cooperative Zendo
u
v
w
x
y
z
A
B
C
D
I expect the first six are all yes but it’s worth checking.
It looks like it might be a “everything except words with <feature>” type rule.
v
w
x
y
z
A
B
C
D
I expect the first six are all yes but it’s worth checking.
It looks like it might be a “everything except words with <feature>” type rule.
-
kuuskytkolme
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
Re: Cooperative Zendo
You were correct in that first six were all yes. The last four were also yes. All were yes.
Information
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.