Not the kind with cardstock and pawns. Mostly play by post Mafia so far.
DanielH
Posts: 3745 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:50 pmPronouns: he/him/his
Post
by DanielH Fri Oct 07, 2016 8:47 pm
kuuskytkolme
Posts: 160 Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 amPronouns: she/her
Post
by kuuskytkolme Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:07 pm
6.28311.
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.
DanielH
Posts: 3745 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:50 pmPronouns: he/him/his
Post
by DanielH Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:16 pm
All yes except the last one.
kuuskytkolme
Posts: 160 Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 amPronouns: she/her
Post
by kuuskytkolme Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:34 pm
2...
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.
DanielH
Posts: 3745 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:50 pmPronouns: he/him/his
Post
by DanielH Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:43 pm
kuuskytkolme
Posts: 160 Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:33 amPronouns: she/her
Post
by kuuskytkolme Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:46 pm
So <n>.<n characters>?
I am number 63. I'm also ESL, please don't eat me.
DanielH
Posts: 3745 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:50 pmPronouns: he/him/his
Post
by DanielH Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:57 pm
Underspecified. What are possible values of <n> here? How are edge cases handled? Multiple reasonable readings of what you said are possible, multiple of them fit the observed data, and at most one is correct.
Unbitwise
Posts: 535 Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:39 amPronouns: he (or they or whatever)
Contact:
Post
by Unbitwise Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:42 am
0.10.1234567890101234567890
Lambda
Posts: 1021 Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:39 amPronouns: She, her
Contact:
Post
by Lambda Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:14 am
00.01.1.
DanielH
Posts: 3745 Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:50 pmPronouns: he/him/his
Post
by DanielH Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:25 am
Unbitwise: yes, yes, no
Lambda, yes, yes, and the initial no classification was correct.
And, to prevent a delay while somebody guesses a more specific rule and I respond, I will point out that the empty string
is a counterexample to all variants of kuuskytkolme’s rule as stated.
