Elcenia Mafia Game Thread

[BlueSkySprite]

Also because MTC hasn't had an explanation like michaelblume or Anthusiasm's illness, or Tamien's camping.
Which are actual good explanations for non participation.
@modrony, thanks, sorry I missed that. It's a lot easier to see votes when they're in a separate line. I'll update in a sec.

[BlueSkySprite]

Unofficial vote count:
Futurevision: 5 (kappa, MTC, Paradox, Shoal, Tamien)
Paradox: 1 (pistachi0n)
MTC 1(BlueSkySprite)
Tulip: 2 (Alphabeta, modrony)
modrony: 3 (anthusiasm, futurevision, Tulip)

Navigation:
Morning 1
Evening 1
Morning 2
Evening 2
Morning 3
Evening 3
Morning 4

[MTC]

BSS: one obvious flaw in your reasoning is that I just am that quiet. I haven’t had much to say, nothing really to add to everyone else’s suspicions, and no change in my suspicions since the previous day. In retrospect I probably should have made a suspicions post saying that before voting for futurevision, but I just ended up not doing so.

[anthusiasm]

I'm voting for you because I don't want futurevision killed, and because I think that while it's plausible that there is an actual Leekath within the game that has the powers you claim to have, it's also plausible that Leekath is a safeclaim. The reason I decided against voting for you originally was that I thought there was probably an actual Leekath in the game because Leekath is an important character, but upon reflection I've decided that that's a bad reason (see: Matilda from the last game).

[modrony]

If people don't think the power is plausible for Leekath, there is little I can do about that.
Though it is not like the effulgence powers were identical to canon powers either.

I'll post my evidence if it looks like a tie otherwise. I don't think it will do significant damage but I'd still rather not.

[jalapeno_dude]

@BSS: You lost my vote somehow (I'm voting for Paradox, as you noted in your summary post on the last page).

@MTC: I think voting without giving a reason is inherently suspicious. At least say "I'm voting for X for the same reasons other people have given," or something like that. Even better is to post an actual reason you think X is guilty/suspicious-looking enough to vote for--this forces you to actually think about it, and if you can't come up with a good reason that probably means you shouldn't be voting for X in the first place.

[MTC]

On further thought, I’m finding modrony slightly more suspicious than futurevision at the moment, so I vote to kill modrony.

[modrony]

ok. that makes it possible for vote weirdness to cause a tie, so here is a thing.
some actual evidence.

Such as it is.

Kappa didn't go anywhere on night 1.
@Kappa: please confirm.

I think Kappa is propably worth making a low priority for the killers even if he doesn't have a (active) power.
I am pretty convinced that he's town and smart.

[Kappa]

You're correct that I'm town. Whether I'm smart is debatable.

Confirm no action night 1.

[BlueSkySprite]

I still think the most suspicious person is mtc
Sorry about the vote count I'm on mobile and pretty sure it's wrong. I don't think I can fix it right now.