Alicornutopia

Well, I might poke [strike]kuuskytkolme[/strike] [strike]kuutskykolme[/strike] [strike]cutesycolm[/strike] 63 instead, or someone else entirely. It was nothing more than an expression of interest.

Alphabeta wrote:Well, I might poke [strike]kuuskytkolme[/strike] [strike]kuutskykolme[/strike] [strike]cutesycolm[/strike] 63 instead, or someone else entirely. It was nothing more than an expression of interest.

you had it right the first time. the way i remember it right now is kuu + sky + t + kolme: kuu like Q, sky like the blue thing outside, t for no good reason, and kolme means 3.

I personally find jalapeño dude a little suspicious but not the most suspicious, tau less than him because reasons I listed about how the mafia would just not say anything about something everyone could see and I'd die in the night like michaelblume.

I currently find no.head.chicken and Thatwasademo most suspicious, I'm not sure if my reasoning is the greatest but they are currently more suspicious to me than jalapeño dude. I am going to bed now, and so wake up in about 3.5 hours and probably between fifteen and forty minutes of internet access before I need to get on more planes to go home. While I'm on airplanes I will probably not have internet for 13 hours or more unless I get lucky with WiFi in the layover.

When I wake up I will read the comments from when I was asleep. If demo has not made a defense I will vote him, and if he has but NHC has not I will vote for NHC, and if NHC also has made a reasonable defense I will continue on in order with the same process with: jalapeño dude, Paradox, Anthusiasm, and Aestrix. If someone convinces me there's something better I can do with the information I will have at that time, I will do that instead. if you think I am voting wrong, look carefully through information you have and vote for someone else and say why. We need more people to vote.

My best defense would be to post my private key. I am not sure if this is warranted at this point.

Okay, I'm now trying to use this space to have my thoughts in order. I've been reading about the stock market and internet protocols for the whole day, so I don't have the brain power to make sense. I'm sorry. I never said I was good at this game, just that I have played a lot.

Anyway, jalapeno's role claim is interesting. I was about to write here about what I assume you are, and now I'm not. I'm giving you one night, if we're both alive tomorrow I'm having my eye on you unless you manage to actually have something to show for your efforts.

I don't like the way tau and BSS have some kind of mutual trust out of nowhere. BSS seems to have a lot of strong opinions on who we shouldn't vote. I still want her to claim. Vague "I'm going to be useful" works for the first two days, after that you actually have to be useful or at least not scummy. @Alphabeta: if she is a double voter and you know this, please share with the class. If there is another person who is a double voter and you know who it is, please do tell us that you have the knowledge without telling who it is.

I don't see claims as bad as all of you, especially when we have lost our most likely cop and medic. Of course there could be some surprises, so I understand why a mass claim could go wrong, I just have a really bad feeling about BSS.

I'm not even angry that I had to use my innocent child trigger, I was already debating if I should claim so I could eat a night kill. The mafia has either a role cop or really experienced player who can sniff out power roles, I don't believe in coincidences.

Wow, there's a person called Thatwasademo in the game? I have no opinion on you. Please tell us your two most and least suspicious players.

kuuskytkolme wrote:Okay, I'm now trying to use this space to have my thoughts in order. I've been reading about the stock market and internet protocols for the whole day, so I don't have the brain power to make sense. I'm sorry. I never said I was good at this game, just that I have played a lot.

Anyway, jalapeno's role claim is interesting. I was about to write here about what I assume you are, and now I'm not. I'm giving you one night, if we're both alive tomorrow I'm having my eye on you unless you manage to actually have something to show for your efforts.

I don't like the way tau and BSS have some kind of mutual trust out of nowhere. BSS seems to have a lot of strong opinions on who we shouldn't vote. I still want her to claim. Vague "I'm going to be useful" works for the first two days, after that you actually have to be useful or at least not scummy. @Alphabeta: if she is a double voter and you know this, please share with the class. If there is another person who is a double voter and you know who it is, please do tell us that you have the knowledge without telling who it is.

Well, there's someone who sometimes has two votes and sometimes doesn't.

As for your suspicion of BSS, I don't think she's in danger of getting mob justiced yet, and that was the only circumstance in which she asked me to out her. I will say that we should try to kill actual scum instead of her.

I don't see claims as bad as all of you, especially when we have lost our most likely cop and medic. Of course there could be some surprises, so I understand why a mass claim could go wrong, I just have a really bad feeling about BSS.

I'm not even angry that I had to use my innocent child trigger, I was already debating if I should claim so I could eat a night kill. The mafia has either a role cop or really experienced player who can sniff out power roles, I don't believe in coincidences.

Well, I personally would rather be the exclusive holder of role knowledge. ;)

Wow, there's a person called Thatwasademo in the game? I have no opinion on you. Please tell us your two most and least suspicious players.

Heh.

I was a lot more active in the early game. Nowadays it seems as though every time I might have something useful to say someone has beaten me to it.

As far as suspicions, aside from our confirmed cult members, I find tau most suspicious, not because of helping decipher public knowledge regarding double-voters (which is a mildly pro-town action, especially in a closed-setup game), but due to voting record (he is the only unconfirmed player to vote for every dead townie/lynchproof person thus far, if search is not lying to me). I find Aestrix least suspicious (aside from our confirmed clear kusskytkolme, who for some reason spellcheck wants to claim is called Moussorgsky), for reasons which are opaque even to myself.

Thatwasademo wrote:I find Aestrix least suspicious (aside from our confirmed clear kusskytkolme, who for some reason spellcheck wants to claim is called Moussorgsky), for reasons which are opaque even to myself.

.... xD

I mean, thank you, you're correct, I'm definitely a townie, but. xD

BSS: could you actually give me something to defend against? Because I've read through today's discussions and have been getting more and more puzzled.
I really don't think I've done anything suspicious and the only reasons I can think of that might make me seem suspicious are: 1) being used to a different format of the game (not just that it's online - the version I've played in RL the most was quite different and thus had different strategies) 2) the way my RL moods have influenced how I've come across online (those moods mostly vary from bad to mopey to furious to unmoving lump) 3) my actual RL personality (not going into too much details, I tend to be passive and indecisive).

I still don't have any reasonable suspicions (what a surprise..) and I won't be able to get at a computer for more than twice a day for the weekend, which means that I'll just have to see if someone manages to uncover something truly suspicious...

Thatwasademo wrote:Moussorgsky

now I really want to figure out how to turn on smilies. Unfortunately, I have an early day tomorrow, so I guess this will have to do: （ˣ∇ˣ）

no.head.chicken wrote:（ˣ∇ˣ）

okay i realise that's a bird of some sort, but i read it as something x rated at first.