Elfthreads!
Re: Elfthreads!
The only person requiring a wand is the binder; it might be possible to have a wizard bind a Muggle in an Unbreakable Vow. That would obviously be terribly illegal because of the Statute of Secrecy, which is of course the most important thing to consider when making an Unbreakable Vow.
EDIT: It might be that the other participants need to be wizards; it might be that they need their wands on them for some reason (as it's implied they might for Apparition); it might be that the binder could learn to do it without a wand. The only person seen deliberately using a wand when we saw the Vow was the binder.
EDIT: It might be that the other participants need to be wizards; it might be that they need their wands on them for some reason (as it's implied they might for Apparition); it might be that the binder could learn to do it without a wand. The only person seen deliberately using a wand when we saw the Vow was the binder.
- jalapeno_dude
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:57 pm
- Pronouns: He
Re: Elfthreads!
I am aware that the plot has moved beyond this point, but why didn't Minor et al have a goldmage jump back to prevent Minor from taking the Vienna summon in the first place? In addition to preventing trauma/potential legal consequences it would have given news of eggs several fewer hours in which to spread.
- MaggieoftheOwls
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:39 pm
- Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: Elfthreads!
Probably because it doesn't qualify as disastrous enough for goldmagery.
- jalapeno_dude
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:57 pm
- Pronouns: He
Re: Elfthreads!
If Minor thought the situation was urgent enought to kill for in order to get the warning out quicker, wouldn't he also think it was urgent enough to goldmage for?MaggieoftheOwls wrote:Probably because it doesn't qualify as disastrous enough for goldmagery.
- pedromvilar
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:48 am
- Pronouns: *shrug*
- Contact:
Re: Elfthreads!
Well, killing is a strictly less terrible thing with the afterlife.
- MaggieoftheOwls
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:39 pm
- Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: Elfthreads!
So far all the situations considered goldmaging for had more than one life lost, I think.
-
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:42 pm
- Pronouns: she/her/hers
Re: Elfthreads!
Yeah, goldmaging involves permanently killing someone (admittedly, a fork who diverged less than a day ago, but still) whereas killing people in Revelation is kind of just portalsnaking them while giving them magic powers.
Re: Elfthreads!
And over 2/3 of the time giving them a pretty good chance of going home, when it’s your summoner.
And goldmagery isn’t just killing the voluntary goldmage fork; it’s killing day-old forks of everybody they’ve interacted with.
And goldmagery isn’t just killing the voluntary goldmage fork; it’s killing day-old forks of everybody they’ve interacted with.
- anthusiasm
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 7:20 pm
- Pronouns: She/her/hers
- Location: http://inquisitivefeminist.tumblr.com
Re: Elfthreads!
hahahahahaha I see what you did there"Yeah, fanfiction just sort of gets weirder and higher context the longer someone keeps the hobby and some people have been doing it a long time.
Re: Elfthreads!
Have we checked what happens if the goldmage fork is also a summoner?lintamande wrote:Yeah, goldmaging involves permanently killing someone (admittedly, a fork who diverged less than a day ago, but still)