Page 53 of 101
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:49 pm
by Shoal
Kappa, has everyone made role lists? I don't remember who hasn't made them yet, but maybe a few people haven't. I was just thinking it would help if PDV had made a more detailed one or if we had more to go on. we don't know if we've seen the last of demon deaths or not :/
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:53 pm
by anthusiasm
I haven't made one yet! I intend to make one before the day is over, but I have been very busy with homework and I would like to have a substantial list so people don't guess my role.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:58 pm
by Kappa
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:00 pm
by modrony
jalapeno_dude was right. It does hurt to not read the spoilers.
So, I will post mine so I can read them. I am glad I had these prepared.
I
was intending to wait so I could make
sure to not influence anyone who hadn't had the chance to prepare yet, but I will just have to trust in your will. This way should be faster anyways.
One of my original suspects was dead so I removed that one.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:20 pm
by jalapeno_dude
Kappa wrote:Living players without listposts: Alphabeta, anthusiasum, michaelblume, futurevision
Can we all agree that
still not having a listpost is
extremely anti-Town, probably more so than a last-minute revelation? (The latter can be caused by any number of things, from RL responsibilities to not knowing you need to defend yourself until then because you've been abstaining from reading spoilers to simply panicking and not wanting to die.)
I can't use bold in this thread to denote emphasis, so I will use italics instead:
I commit to voting for someone who has not posted a listpost, assuming that is true of anyone at the end of the day. At the point people seem to have started voting I will pick someone from the subset of the people quoted above who have not posted listposts by that time. Should the person I am voting for post an acceptable listpost, I will switch to another player without a listpost if one still exists, and continue this process until no one with listposts is left is necessary. I will leave myself two loopholes: 1) if someone is clearly revealed as anti-Town before the point I post my vote I *may* vote for them instead. 2) I reserve the right to switch from someone with no listpost to someone with a listpost if I think it absolutely necessary, but in this case I will be absolutely clear about why I am doing so.
I hope other people will commit to doing the same thing.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:25 pm
by Shoal
sounds good to me. I already know what order i'll vote them in, too.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:30 pm
by jalapeno_dude
Modrony, glad you've come around to my way of thinking. :p I want to defend one of the people you've mentioned a little bit:
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:32 pm
by jalapeno_dude
Shoal wrote:sounds good to me. I already know what order i'll vote them in, too.
Shoal, do you mind writing up some statement in italics? You could copy-paste mine if you're lazy. I think the ritual will make people more likely to follow through.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:38 pm
by modrony
I agree that not having a list is anti town.
I do feel the last minute thing is worse thou.
All of those people are somewhat suspicious for other reasons thou, so you may have a point
I like the idea of using a precommitment to enforce conduct.
On some other day I might be with you. Today I do feel I have a strong candidate I am likely to vote for.
Re: Elcenia Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:40 pm
by Shoal
I don't really get the precommitment thing. I think it's a cultural thing I'm missing out on. I see it as tying the hands of my future self who will have more knowledge, information, and sense than I have, and the only way to get around that is to leave loopholes so wide I might as well have not committed to doing anything at all.
But it looks like I'm in the minority about this so, sure, I currently intend to vote for futurevision, michaelblume, anthusiasm, and/or Alphabeta, sequentially, removing those that have since composed listposts from the pool, switching to somebody from an entirely different pool of suspects if they should seem more scummy, and if one of them composes a listpost I'll vote the next in line. But I am hoping I won't have to vote for anthusiasm, who I'm townreading on her own merits.