Alicornutopia

kuuskytkolme wrote:What makes you think he knew they were/are townies?

Because the Mafia usually know each other in this sort of game.

Okay, but what makes you think he is mafia?

kuuskytkolme wrote:Okay, but what makes you think he is mafia?

He keeps trying to direct the lynch vote at town-affiliates, as I said.

That's circular.

He's mafia because he wants to lynch townies.

He knows they're townies because he's mafia.

What makes you think he isn't a townie with bad reads?

[sarcasm]That isn’t circular logic at all.[/sarcasm]

As I said, I have no special information about who is Town-affiliated. I am far from the only person to have voted for AndaisQ or for BlueSkySprite (who, I might point out, is not actually known to be Town, just suspected to be). I didn’t even start the wagon for either of them, unless you still believe I managed to manipulate random.org. I started the wagon for michaelblume yesterday, and I’ll unvote for Ozy and instead vote for michaelblume today, but I readily admitted it was on weak evidence and I’d change my vote if anything better came along. Now the voting is partially defensive, because nobody has many votes and I’d rather michaelblume die than me.

If you want to be suspicious of people for voting against those who are town-aligned, why not be suspicious of Aestrix, jalapeno_dude, michaelblume, no.head.chicken, Paradox, pistachi0n, Shoal, Tamien, tau, thatwasademo, modrony, or Tulip? They all share at least one of my votes, Thatwasademo shares both, and several other people have voted for those I think are probably Town. Tulip and modrony are on that list, and they are confirmed Town. Other than them, I just named over half of the people still alive. Why are you singling me out?

EDIT: Two more things. 1. If I were a killer, I probably wouldn’t have killed somebody who had voted with me on Day 1, because I could probably keep convincing them into bad lynches. 2. If michaelblume turns out to be innocent, that will cast a *tiny* amount more suspicion on me because I did actually start a wagon against him. It shouldn’t cast much on me, though, because I admitted it was a weak wagon and I switched as soon as somebody proposed a better argument, even if it didn’t work out. If he isn’t innocent, it should remove suspicion from me, because bussing is generally a bad strategy.

I've been reading/following, but I haven't said anything because I'm incredibly unsure who to vote for. I do agree with the policy of killing people who don't talk, and we do have (incredibly weak) evidence against, so I suppose I can vote michaelblume, though I'm willing to vote for... someone else if he does defend himself. I've been mostly pretty confused about who the mafia are.

Also, has anyone else not been talking much? Is there a way we can figure that out?

EDIT: and if not michaelblume, we should likely lynch someone... I'm just not sure who else we have evidence against, or who is acting suspicious beyond a base level.

I guess we should probably kill someone, but I'm not convinced by any of the arguments that have been put forth so far. I abstain.

If michaelblume were in the mafia, why would they have killed one of the only people who voted to kill him on day 2? I think he's being framed.

For revenge, pistachi0n?