Re: Short Stories Mafia Game Thread
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:44 pm
I’m not sure the “town don’t get as defensive as scum” rule of thumb works as well here, given BSS first game and Aestrix second game. Then again, I would totally be expected to say that if I were defensive because I were scum.
So, this is going a bit slowly. We have almost no evidence. Let’s talk about strategy, something that can be useful for the game but doesn’t directly involve suspecting anybody; we can see how people behave in both discussions and then we’ll have stronger suspicions later. Last game saw two changes to standard strategy, list posts and suspicion posts. Both were actually proposed by the townies, but were much more useful to the Ryganaavlanik (primary scum faction). However, there were good pro-Town motives behind them; does anybody have any idea to capture the supposed benefits without the drawbacks of their actual implementation? I have some ideas for fixing suspicion posts (which I got because somebody else mentioned this first, I think in the post-mortem), but no ideas for fixing list posts.
For those who weren’t there, the list posts were where people wrote about their suspicions of what powers the various characters had, and promised to include their own character and power on the list. Ideally, this would help town identify what the powers of dead players were (by looking up the revealed character name in the list) without telling the scum anything (because of the noise of the other list entries). In actuality it was almost as scum-beneficial as people actually roleclaiming, because the scum had a name cop and because people weren’t always very good at making fake entries.
The suspicion posts were where people wrote down on the first sidereal day of the Mafia day who they were suspicious of, without reading anybody else’s suspicion posts. This was to help them form and stick to independent suspicions, to combat groupthink. Instead, the scum read the suspicion posts and were “independently” suspicious of all the same people as other people were; since people came to these suspicions “independently”, they were seen as more likely to be reasonable instead of groupthink. This also caused delays in discussion and voting, negating some of the benefit of the long days.
My (stolen) idea to fix suspicion lists is twofold: First, generate and write down your suspicions in the game night; preferably write down the whole post. Then you could keep the benefit of those suspicions not being influenced by groupthink, while discussing them right away. Second, don’t forget that anybody can post their suspicions after reading everything else; there are people in this game who are out to get you and will happily lie about what they have and have not read. If people listen to this idea or something similar, most or all of them will claim to have written their post before reading anybody else’s. Some of them will be telling the truth and some will be lying; ignore this claim like you would ignore somebody outright claiming to be town without evidence to back them up.
Does anybody have any other ideas for suspicion posts, or any thoughts on why my proposed alterations could still be dangerous? Does anybody have any thoughts on capturing the benefits of listposts without handing the game to the scum (unfortunately, “make better listposts” and “hope the scum don’t have a namecop” are not viable suggestions)? Does anybody want to cast suspicion on me by pointing out that scum often give sound-seeming strategic advice to town because this is an easy way to look town (which is totally true, but we as town still need to have strategy discussions)?
So, this is going a bit slowly. We have almost no evidence. Let’s talk about strategy, something that can be useful for the game but doesn’t directly involve suspecting anybody; we can see how people behave in both discussions and then we’ll have stronger suspicions later. Last game saw two changes to standard strategy, list posts and suspicion posts. Both were actually proposed by the townies, but were much more useful to the Ryganaavlanik (primary scum faction). However, there were good pro-Town motives behind them; does anybody have any idea to capture the supposed benefits without the drawbacks of their actual implementation? I have some ideas for fixing suspicion posts (which I got because somebody else mentioned this first, I think in the post-mortem), but no ideas for fixing list posts.
For those who weren’t there, the list posts were where people wrote about their suspicions of what powers the various characters had, and promised to include their own character and power on the list. Ideally, this would help town identify what the powers of dead players were (by looking up the revealed character name in the list) without telling the scum anything (because of the noise of the other list entries). In actuality it was almost as scum-beneficial as people actually roleclaiming, because the scum had a name cop and because people weren’t always very good at making fake entries.
The suspicion posts were where people wrote down on the first sidereal day of the Mafia day who they were suspicious of, without reading anybody else’s suspicion posts. This was to help them form and stick to independent suspicions, to combat groupthink. Instead, the scum read the suspicion posts and were “independently” suspicious of all the same people as other people were; since people came to these suspicions “independently”, they were seen as more likely to be reasonable instead of groupthink. This also caused delays in discussion and voting, negating some of the benefit of the long days.
My (stolen) idea to fix suspicion lists is twofold: First, generate and write down your suspicions in the game night; preferably write down the whole post. Then you could keep the benefit of those suspicions not being influenced by groupthink, while discussing them right away. Second, don’t forget that anybody can post their suspicions after reading everything else; there are people in this game who are out to get you and will happily lie about what they have and have not read. If people listen to this idea or something similar, most or all of them will claim to have written their post before reading anybody else’s. Some of them will be telling the truth and some will be lying; ignore this claim like you would ignore somebody outright claiming to be town without evidence to back them up.
Does anybody have any other ideas for suspicion posts, or any thoughts on why my proposed alterations could still be dangerous? Does anybody have any thoughts on capturing the benefits of listposts without handing the game to the scum (unfortunately, “make better listposts” and “hope the scum don’t have a namecop” are not viable suggestions)? Does anybody want to cast suspicion on me by pointing out that scum often give sound-seeming strategic advice to town because this is an easy way to look town (which is totally true, but we as town still need to have strategy discussions)?