Page 24 of 49
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:05 pm
by Unbitwise
Might as well confirm that set...
1.1
1.3
1.6
1.7
1.8
..0
..1
..2
..3
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:22 pm
by DanielH
That’s twice in a row you’ve only listed nine things instead of ten, so I’ll throw in
..5
for free (since I expect it’s the next you’d ask for).
The first five are yes, the rest are no.
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:51 am
by kuuskytkolme
..
....
.....
......
00
000
0000
00000
000000
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:02 am
by Throne3d
1.41421..
1.41421.
1.41421
1.4142
1.414
1.41
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:32 am
by DanielH
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:03 am
by Unbitwise
For the sake of the counterexample, I hereby guess that the rule is: "1." followed by any single allowed character
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:21 am
by DanielH
The rule does not dislike all (representations of) irrational numbers; 6.283...
is allowed.
Edit: too late to retract this but the empty string is also a counterexample.
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 8:02 am
by Lambda
111
123
321
..6
..7
..8
..9
..0
6.2
6.3
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:51 am
by Unbitwise
6.284...
6.285...
..283...
6.283
6.283.
6.283..
Re: Cooperative Zendo
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:32 pm
by DanielH
Lambda: all no
Unbitwise: yes, yes, no, no, no, no