Page 18 of 30
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:00 pm
by Alicorn
There is not a Zev in this 'verse and it's not the first time (although it is the most necessary one).
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:57 am
by Goldenlima
Given bells' general attitude regarding notebooks, I am a little surprised that Iobel had such difficulty understanding Edarial's issue with number comparisons.
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:03 am
by Alicorn
The numbers are not private. Adarins tell them to each other and to their objects, while Bells keep notebook-contents private to begin with.
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:19 pm
by Lambda
Could a runecasting scroll incantation be in sign language?
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:47 pm
by Alicorn
I think so.
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:06 pm
by Bluelantern
Hey, Alicorn, have some of my tears fresh from Gemini :(
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:11 pm
by Aestrix
Hey now! We're splitting those, fifty fifty! I like fresh tears, too! They are delicious.
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:22 am
by PlainDealingVillain
Wait, is Rae going to acolyte Cricket? Because that sounded like Rae obliquely asking if it was safe to acolyte Cricket.
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:20 am
by Tamien
I have forgotten, is there a compelling reason for Katydid and Rain to not get daemons and then just separate and leave them cuddling somewhere very very safe, like in an underground shelter on Ice's world or under the Belfry or something? None of their personal enemies will know that daemons are a thing to want to go harm them, and no one on Ice's world is going to know about them to seek them out nor would they accidentally daemon-touch, and the entire Incandescent Peal will want to protect them, so the danger really seems very remote, while the benefits are possibly quite high. They could even potentially create magic items (linked mirrors, for example) or technology to allow their daemons to remotely keep tabs on them and communicate with them. Is there something I'm leaving out of my danger calculations or do they really find that very minuscule potential risk to be not worth the evident emotional-relational benefits? (They are probably more risk-averse than I am, so I suppose it really may be just that. It just seems silly to me, considering how much they harp on it and yet continue to dismiss it.)
Re: There should also be an Incandescence thread
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:45 am
by Alicorn
Getting a daemon is irreversible, keeping them holed up forever with nothing to do sounds like it would be a bad idea, and the benefits aren't really that spectacular (most of the pairs don't have them; Ice and Cypress were just the ones to crash the picnic and loom particularly large as examples so they keep coming up in conversation). They also don't know what they'd get; one of them could wind up with a fish or something and make cuddling not particularly viable.